We both love the older photo (option A), but it is old, 3 ½ months old, and they are so different now. But they look so damn cute and smiley!!! The new photo I took just the other day (option B) and it’s also very cute. I like it a lot but Tony says he still likes the old one, but could be easily persuaded. I think it’s silly to use an older photo when they look so much different now and the new photo is cute too. So this is where our dilemma comes in. Older and cuter, or current and almost as cute? Argh!
Please comment me your opinions. Act now! One of the papers is publishing on 1/9 and if we submit by 12/31 we could be chosen for the cover! And you know we would… we have triplets!!! Hehehe! : )
Thanks to everyone for your time and opinions!
Option A (L-R: Tess, Nora, Holden):
Option B (L-R: Nora, Holden, Tess):
I think they are both precious. But, I would use the one you like best because the "babies of '08" theme covers the whole year and that pic was taken in '08, too. I think it's totally fine to use that one.
ReplyDeleteLOVE LOVE LOVE both photos! I say use the newer one. While I was reading the post (b4 I say the photos) I was thinking come on how much different could they look in 3 months. Holy Shit! The difference is huge!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteThey are both REALLY cute, but I'd go with the newer one - that way after you get on the cover everyone with recgonize your babies :)
ReplyDeleteAwww, they are both really cute but I vote b. Merry Christmas!!
ReplyDelete